在去年農曆新年期間, 某宗教的信徒.
在揮春上, 放上外教信仰, 廣泛流傳,
神棍又公開地推擴宣傳迷信
令農曆新年大為失色

煩請神棍們….
在農曆新年期間停止公開歪曲中華史實, 文化和信仰

更請某宗教信徒們…
在農曆新年期間停止公開汚染中華史實, 文化和信仰

多謝合作!

[This is a discussion between two people on an article]

Religion and other forms of magical thinking continue to thrive — despite the lack of evidence and advance of science — because people are naturally biased to accept a role for the irrational, said Bruce Hood, Professor of Experimental Psychology at the University of Bristol.[2]

This evolved credulity suggests that it would be impossible to root out belief in ideas such as creationism and paranormal phenomena, even though they have been countered by evidence and are held as a matter of faith alone.[2]

It [2] doesn’t serve as evidence or proof of any kind.  It’s just a huge coloring-in of what people think fits if they want to hold fast to naturalism being fake.  It also makes a few appeals to the authority without telling why he his supposed conclusions or supposed evidence are so authoritative.  It’s really a pathetic display of pomp over theists and mystics, disguised as scientific news.

Creation is just a hypothesis; nobody can prove it or demonstrate that creation didn’t happen. Evolution is a process; it happens daily and it has been happening for a long period of time. If creation is real, the stories in bible are real, then, the ancient living things should be identical to the modern living organisms. Of course, there are much more evidence to support evolution.

Evolution is not an evidence to support “god doesn’t exist”. It can be an machinery for the creator to create the world. Again, it is just a hypothesis. That is why I am an agnostics.

I won’t debate creation and evolution, as they are two different things – one is a hypothesis while the other one is a process.

Well if that is all that Evolution is, then you would be right.  Then again, we could really go bare-bones, saying that evolution is just another word for progress or for any change over time.

I was referring to the Evolution that Darwin made popular.  Creationists have a term, baramin, which is also said “created kind”.  “A species is a man-made term used in the modern classification system. And frankly, the word species is difficult to define, whether one is a creationist or not!“  Also, as baraminology is being refined, a “Baramin is commonly believed to be at the level of family and possibly order for some plants/animals (according to the common classification scheme of kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species). On rare occasions a kind may be equivalent to the genus or species levels.“  One baramin does not give birth to another kind, no matter how subtly it is part of the other kind.

It’s not the case that (Biblically) Literal Creationism demands that animals be exactly the same as their ancestors of 4004 B.C.  As someone who accepts that the Global Flood really happened, i believe in a more active evolution of animals than a Darwin-like Evolutionist does.  2348 B.C. (or was it 2347, oops) is last minute for Darwin-like Evolution.  But, no morphological advancement would make a new baramin (a.k.a. created kind), neither has such been observed.

You are right: “Evolution is not an evidence to support “god doesn’t exist”.”Even if you stated, “Evolution does not force the idea that god doesn’t exist.”  Besides that D.Evolution is not evidence, you would still be right.  But, for your soul’s sake, theism and even monotheism are not enough.  E.g. James 2:19 in the Bible, “You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble!”  Bible-ism is better than monotheism.  E.g. Jesus said in Mark 8:38 and similarly in Luke 9:26, “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.”  All i’m really trying to say in this paragraph is that monotheism is just a starting point in accepting the truthfulness of the Bible, and thus Darwin-like Evolution is anti-Bible and not anti-universe-creator if you stick to a modern, generic One that used or allowed Darwinism.

There are many evidence for evolution; evolution talks about the process of the change of the organisms but not how the life begins. There is no conflict between creation and evolution. Let’s get back to the “time frame of evolution”. According to bible, world was created only a few thousand years ago! I won’t expect much difference between today organisms and those existed a few thousand years ago. But we know that there were living things long before “those few days” that Bible God created the world.

Again, there is no evidence for “no creator” and there is also no evidence for “the existence of creator”. Intelligent design as well as atheism are absolutely fine to me, and I am an agnostic.

One more thing — Bible God is not necessary The Creator.
Here are some key hypotheses:

1. There is a Creator.
2. Creator created the world.
3. Bible God exists.
4. Bible God is the creator.
5. Bible God is love.
6. Global flood existed. Bible God almost erased all the living things on earth just simply because a few people worshiped other gods.

Look, hypothesis 5 contradicts hypothesis 6. Besides, Bible’s description about nature is quite different from what we have observed. In addition, there are also lots of questions in Bible. For example, right before Jesus died, Jesus said something like … “God, why did you give me up?” This really indicated Jesus was not closely related to God. Besides, Jesus never said, he was the God. And, I don’t find anything about trinity in the bible. Please, don’t take it wrong. I am not saying there is no Creator, no God. I just don’t know. On the other hand, there are too many issues and hypotheses related to Bible/Creation, and that is why I am an agnostic.

[We can't really debate a topic based on personal feelings or opinion, simply because there is no conclusion. ]

Extracted from:

http://scibean.xanga.com/720044118/why-are-creationists-always-the-winners/?page=1&jump=1508337291#1508337291

In the year of 2008, 76% of American are Christian. [1]

A study of 5,500 people, published in the journal Circulation, suggests that when it comes to heart disease and clogged arteries, attending religious services or having spiritual experiences may not protect against heart attacks and strokes.

Dr. Donald Lloyd-Jones, of the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, who led the study concluded “There’s not a lot of extra burden or extra protection afforded by this particular aspect of people’s lives.” Neither the rate of heart disease events, nor the number of certain risk factors — such as high cholesterol, diabetes, and high blood pressure — differed among those who were more or less religious or spiritual.

The researchers did note that those who went to religious services, prayed, meditated, or were highly spiritual were more likely to be obese, and less likely to smoke. The obesity finding was not surprising, given that congregations and families often “fellowship” over meals. Given that many religions discourage smoking tobacco, the smoking finding was not difficult to explain.

Koenig also noted that half of the people studied were either African American or Hispanic, groups that, on average, have poorer access to health care than whites and Asian Americans.African Americans, on average, are also some of the most religious people in the world.

Ivan Oransky Being religious may not make you healthier after all Reuters Mon Feb 8, 5:16 pm ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100208/lf_nm_life/us_religion_health

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

Sarah Palin declared “America is ready for another revolution” and repeatedly assailed President Barack Obama on Saturday before adoring “tea party” activists. They make up a seemingly natural constituency should she run for president. “This movement is about the people,” the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee said as the crowd roared. “Government is supposed to be working for the people.” Palin note Democrats’ electoral losses since Obama took office a year ago with talk of hope and promises of change and asked: “How’s that hope-y, change-y stuff workin’ out for you?”

For details, please, click:

Palin tells ‘tea party’: It’s revolution time

———————————————-

I don’t think Obama did a good job to rescue our economy.  But, I don’t regret that I voted for him as US president. I voted for Obama, just because I don’t like Sarah Palin. 

The Haiti government’s communications minister, Marie-Laurence Jocelyn Lassegue, recently acknowledged the vulnerability of women and children. Women who lined up for food before dawn Saturday said they were attacked by knife-wielding men who stole their coupons. “At 4 a.m. we were coming and a group of men came out from an alley,” said Paquet Marly, 28, who was waiting for rice to feed her two daughters, mother and extended family. “They came out with knives and said, ‘Give me your coupons.’ We were obliged to give them. Now we have nothing — no coupons and no food.”

Aid organizations set up women-only distribution schemes because they trust the primary caregivers to get that food to extended family, not resell it. “We’ve targeted the women because we think it’s the best way to get to families,” said Jacques Montouroy, a Catholic Relief Services worker helping out Saturday. “In other distributions when we’ve opened it up to men, we found that only half of the men would do what they were supposed to with the food.”

Soldiers from the U.S. 82nd Airborne Division out of Fort Bragg, North Carolina, guard many of the streets around the distribution points, but they can’t be everywhere all the time. Even if the women successfully make it back to the camps with their 55-pound (25-kilogram) bags of rice, that doesn’t mean their worries are over. Some camps are even providing special protection for women, with tents where they can receive trauma counseling or be alone to breast-feed and care for young children.

Women have long been second-class citizens in Haiti. Haitian Constitution does not specifically prohibit sexual discrimination. A 2004 U.N. report estimated 19 percent of girls between the ages of 15 and 19 were married, divorced or widowed. Rape was only made a criminal offense in Haiti in 2005. In the months after a violent uprising ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 2004, thousands of women were raped or sexually abused, the British medical journal Lancet reported.

Because so many police stations and government offices were destroyed in the earthquake, some women may have no place to go to report assaults. Women recovering from quake-related injuries are even more vulnerable because many are not mobile. An additional threat is HIV; Haiti has the highest infection rate in the Caribbean.

As women lined up for food at the National Palace on Saturday, U.S. soldiers kept the men behind a cordon. “It’s discrimination!” said Thomas Louis, 40. “We’ve all lost mothers, sisters, wives. Without women we can’t get coupons. They’re treating men like we are animals.”

This article is summarized from: Haitian women become crime targets after quake

Question: What help has UN offered to Haitian?

Hak-Shing William Tam, River of Life Christian Church, Santa Clara, CA said,

“In a macro environment in which homosexuality is gradually accepted as being normal, child molesting by gays is gradually being viewed as normal in academia. Children who were subjected to sexual abuse only know to socialize with other men through sex. When they grow up, they would do the same to other children by molesting children of the same sex. Therefore, gay people grow in numbers even as most of them do not have children of their own.” [3]

傳統家庭促進會會長譚克成博士作證，為華人基督徒群體發聲，堅稱「保持傳統婚姻對亞裔家庭很重要」。譚博士坦誠答辯，承認曾經在華人基督教組織「美國回歸真神禱告運動」網站刊載一篇文章，標題是「研究發現同性戀和孌童癖有關」，並強調他是根據所讀過的各種不同資料所得出的。[4]

大家又睇吓邊d卜街有”孌童癖”:

英國劍橋大學一名涉嫌與孌童案有關被警方調查的座堂主任牧師，被發現在家中死亡。有消息指他心臟病發，但他的一名朋友相信他自殺。 五十歲的湯普森是劍橋大學國王學院教堂的座堂主任牧師，上周四在劍橋郡寓所內死亡。 [5]

位於Bathurst的一家天主教男子學校內爆出性侵犯案件。 據悉，該學校的一名有著“孌童癖”的前牧師因涉嫌跟60宗兒童性侵犯案件有關，再次遭警方落控。 這名65歲的孌童癖者是於前晚被捕的，並且被警方正式落控，據悉，這名孌童癖者在是20世紀70年代至80年代期間，在聖斯坦尼斯洛斯學院（StStanislaus’ College）內，對學校內的男孩施展了魔手的。[6]

基督教救世軍卜維廉隊李祖康（廿一歲）聲稱覺得住所對面小學的女生「合眼緣」，便趁受害女生離家外出或放學返家時截住搭訕，甚至動手阻止受害女生離開。李祖康一而再、再而三地侵犯年幼女童，顯示被告有不為人知的陰暗面。[7]

大 埔 611 靈 糧 堂 一 名 傳 道 人 涉 嫌 性 侵 犯 年 輕 女 友 事 件 ， 涉 及 事 件 的 傳 道 人 昨 日 主 動 到 大 埔 警 署 自 首 ， 承 認 於 去 年 中 至 今 年 初 ， 先 後 多 次 非 禮 一 名 女 友 ， 案 件 現 交 由 大 埔 重 案 組 第 一 隊 調 查 。據 悉 ， 該 名 傳 道 人 已 婚 並 育 有 三 子 女 ， 與 受 害 人 同 屬 基 督 會 的 大 埔 611 靈 糧 堂 。 受 害 人 及 其 家 人 均 為 虔 誠 基 督 徒 ， 每 周 均 參 加 會 聚 會 ， 受 害 人 是 一 名 十 六 歲 中 學 生 ， 父 母 離 異 ， 現 與 母 親 同 住 。 據 悉 ， 有 人 一 直 對 受 害 人 表 現 關 懷 備 至 ， 趁 受 害 人 母 親 不 在 家 時 多 次 非 禮 受 害 人 。 直 至 近 日 受 害 人向 母 親 哭 訴 ， 其 母 代 為 出 頭 向 會 投 訴 及 考 慮 報 警 ， 會 在 查 證 後 要 求 傳 道 人 辭 職..[8]

倡導「一夫多妻制」的摩門教基本教義「後期聖徒教會」（簡稱FLDS），教主沃倫‧傑夫斯（Warren Jeffs）3年前被FBI列為十大通緝要犯，鋃鐺入獄後仍繼續「遙控」亞歷桑納州科羅拉多城社區。美國《國家地理雜誌》記者和傑夫斯商談數次後，破例被 獲准進入教派內部深入採訪，揭露真實而荒誕的「一夫多妻」生活。 高齡88歲的沃倫‧傑夫斯擁有70多名妻妾、60多名子女，以及個人資產上億美元的FLDS，旗下信徒6000多名。在那裡，婦女沒有自由和權利，女孩子長到13歲就要被迫嫁人，性虐待和性侵犯及對兒童的性騷擾更是時有所聞，強姦等暴行還會受到包庇。[9]

天 主教會性侵醜聞越演越烈，包括澳洲，巴西，愛爾蘭，德國都有神職人員涉案。德國從今年1月開始，至少已有300名受害者，出面指控當年在天主教唱詩班跟 學校遭神職人員性侵。愛爾蘭主教日前，甚至公開針對他1975年處理神父性侵案時，要求兩名男童簽下保密切結書的做法公開致歉。該名神父擔任40年神職人 員期間，性侵過上百名兒童。[10] 

德國的天主教教士性侵害醜聞愈演愈烈，甚至波及來自德國的教宗本篤16世。他當年主持的大主教區透露，他曾把一名涉嫌孌童的教士調到別的教區，而這個教士後來又侵害別的兒童。本篤尚未當選教宗前，也曾在2001年致函所有主教，要求涉及未成年人的所有性侵案，都必須轉送給當時由他主管的教義部處理，並列入教廷的最高機密檔案。德國司法部長根據上述信函，指責梵蒂岡高築「沉默之牆」，企圖防止性侵案件受到法律制裁。[11]

教宗批評愛爾蘭教會的領導人未能回應有關虐待的指責是犯下了嚴重的錯誤。 愛爾蘭的一個受害者團體對教宗的書面道歉表示失望，認為這沒有承認梵蒂岡在這裏面的責任，也沒有呼籲愛爾蘭現在的天主教會大主教辭職。[12]

愛爾蘭性侵受害者組織「一/四團體」(One in Four)在19日指出，教宗應該在牧函中，向受害的愛爾蘭人道歉，並且承認天主教教會濫用權力，刻意掩蓋有戀童癖神父的行為。同時教宗也應該就震驚全愛爾蘭的神職人員性侵醜聞，表達歉意。否認他們不會接受。[13]

——————————————————————————————————–

相信只有呢個教會才可和基督教相比!  _______________________________________________________________________________

大家又睇吓邊d卜街另帶小孩:

趁火打劫”這個成語，常常用來形容一些乘人之危大撈便宜的人。正當海地人民沉浸在震後的悲痛中時，有人卻打起了海地孤兒的主意。10名美國教會團體人士上星期五企圖從海地偷運33名兒童到鄰國的多米尼加共和國。[1] 這些落網的美國人聲稱是愛達荷州名為“新生活兒童庇護所”的慈善機構成員。這家機構曾在海地地震後在網站上發佈消息說，要為“海地孤兒救助行動”募集錢款和志願者。現年40歲的勞拉·西爾斯比自稱是該機構負責人。[2]

這些美國人堅持說孩子都是孤兒，但當局發現部分兒童的家長依然健在。[1] 其父母不是自願把孩子給他們。

___________________________________________________________

基督教會牧師, 傳教者 最叻就是歪曲事情, 抹黑異議人仕, 以信仰打壓別人… 當然目的不外是”想多一些人信教”! —> 每人俸上10%人工….正呀!

再講, 耶穌都冇話過佢係神, 聖經冇記載三位一體, 耶和華和耶穌在性格上和處事方式極不同,

馬 太 福 音 27:46
約在申初，耶穌大聲喊著說：以利！以利！拉馬撒巴各大尼？就是說：我的神！我的神！為甚麼離棄我？. ….. 這段經文已證明耶穌和神無關

____________________________________________________________

再講, 一夫一妻是現代婚姻制度, 我是讚成. 有班”大話精”話這是中國傳統婚姻制度, 廢話! 中國一向是三妻四妾, 窮人就冇妻冇妾, 也有地方一妻多夫制, 換言之, 婚姻制度是隨着環境, 時間而改變. 班“大話精”再用這大話去壓迫同性同居者…. 班友重要同你講: 神是愛, 是公義! …

一些人是愛講大話的, 不如搞個”傳統大話促進會”!  HA HA HA 笑死人!!!

Reference:

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2010/02/100205_brief_haiti_distracting.shtml

[2] http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2010/02/05/110s2752078.htm

[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/us/22sftam.html

[4] http://gospelherald.com/news/soc-13880-0/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83-%E5%90%8C%E6%80%A7%E6%88%80-%E8%AD%9A%E5%85%8B%E6%88%90%E5%8D%9A%E5%A3%AB%E5%85%AB%E8%99%9F%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88%E5%BA%AD%E8%BE%AF%E4%B8%8A%E4%BD%9C%E8%AD%89%E4%BF%83%E7%B6%AD%E8%AD%B7%E5%82%B3%E7%B5%B1%E5%A9%9A%E5%A7%BB-%E5%9F%BA%E7%9D%A3%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1

[5] http://www.hkreporter.com/talks/thread-821511-1-1.html

[6] http://news.waiwai.com.au/national/2008/09/04/2651.html

[7] http://www.hk-laws.com/html/14/n-414.html

[8] http://atfape.blogspot.com/2006/09/blog-post_08.html

[9] http://www.nownews.com/2010/01/29/91-2564182.htm

[10] 教士性侵醜聞 波及教宗 世界新聞網 March 14, 2010

[11] 簡訊：教宗就愛爾蘭案件道歉 BBC March 20, 2010

[12] 神父性侵兒童引發眾怒 教宗今發表牧函Rti March 20, 2010

[13] 德神父性侵醜聞 逾300名受害者指控 公視晚間新聞 March 19, 2010

天主教會為維持過去殖民時代辦學的絕對權威，拒絶接受《校本條例》，成立法團校董會，加入經選舉產生的家長、教師及校友代表，並提訴訟。

結果，天網恢恢，上訴法庭粉碎了他們獨攬〔教育／宗教合一〕的惡夢！

http://www.singtao.com/yesterday/loc/0204ao03.html

過去基督教藉著港英勢力利用信仰和辦學自由在香港散播迷信／擴張勢力，企圖影響政府的政策，維護他們的獨尊地位！基督教學校接受政府資助／津貼，不但行政／財政欠透明度，

教學理念與傳教野心混為一潭〔死水〕，於是出現假公濟私，利益輸送等情況，將公帑用作投資及傳教的勾當上！

現今時移勢易，是整頓基督教霸道勢力的時候了！如果基督校要脅放棄辦權，就是邁向全面國民教育的最好契機！

那個教主簡直食懵了！竟將削除基督教的絕對管治權，形容其情況像「你請食飯，我付錢」一樣！

有誰不知基督教的行政／教學經費絶大部份來自政府公帑的？

政府請你們吃飯出的是雞鮑翅，你們只費點豉油而已，

而且吃完之後，還沒說句多謝便〔打包〕袋袋平安呢！
———————-
 
一些基督教學校近乎強迫學生和家長去信教, 又抹黑中華文化信仰… 就算冇用政府資源, 學校亦必須而德教學, 教導學生分析方法, 作育英才, 絕不能把學校变成傳播迷信工具或洗頭場!

原文: http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/lck-mokche/article?mid=9809

2009年, 聖公會大主教鄺保羅亦發表聖誕文告，表示理解梅窩居民，反對戒毒學校正生書院搬到當地的心情。鄺保羅指，如果社會無一處地方設置這 些措施，受助者有被排斥及被歧視的感覺，希望社會包涵。聖公會教訓梅窩居民不要排斥歧視他人, 叫人不要自私.  又請你先睇以下一段新聞:

香港聖公會1990年代與地產商長實合作，以換地方式將大埔滘聖基道兒童院地皮發展住宅樓盤鹿茵山莊，從中獲利至少4.5億元及完工後當中約三分之一單位、即120個住宅及100個車位給予聖公會出售或自用。稅務局 指聖公會的行為等同做生意，徵收利得稅逾1.8億元，聖公會不服上訴高院，自稱作為宗教團體，所有收入均作慈善用途，政府不應徵稅。稅務局的資深大律師吳嘉輝: 教會、基金及管業委員會作為3個獨立機構，不應共享一個團體目的，事實上教會未能向稅局清楚解釋成立目的及所謂 「慈善用途」的意思。他舉例，有教會籌錢只為宣傳教會，這就不算慈善用途。

香港基督教聖公會見證左d乜—–> 貪, 自私, 偽善!  再講正生只用三數小時教學, 其餘時間是傳”迷信” 及要學生晚上工作, 搞到學生成績超低, 其實只是浪費學生青春作吸納社會資源用… 而吸納咗的$作海外投資… 本人亦表示理解”錢的重要”, 明白”揾錢的重要”, 本人指, 如果社會無一人像那些宗教團體的自私和偽善, 港人可生活好些.


Reference:
基督教天主教聖誕文告提出反吸毒問題 23.12.2009 15:50
http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsdetail.aspx?ItemId=187033
聖公會賣地拒交1.8億稅 稅局︰發展鹿茵非為慈善 (明報)2010年1月21日 星期四 05:10 【明報專訊】